Tony Bradberry

Most B2B marketing plans look impressive in January, start showing cracks by March, and are completely ignored by June. The problem isn’t execution—it’s that they’re built on fundamentally broken assumptions about tactics instead of revenue outcomes.

Your marketing dashboard shows 100 new leads this month, but deals keep stalling in your funnel. The problem isn’t lead quality or sales follow-up—it’s that you’re treating human beings like database entries instead of helping them navigate complex buying decisions.

Most B2B teams waste months debating ABM versus demand generation while their pipeline stays flat. The real problem isn’t choosing between tactics—it’s that they’re asking the wrong strategic question from the start.

Setting the right marketing budget is tough for B2B leaders. Most spend without benchmarks or revenue alignment, leaving growth at risk. Research shows typical investment is 7–12% of revenue. An audit helps confirm if your spend is realistic.

Most marketing plans start the year full of energy, but by the time Q2 rolls around, results are flat and leadership begins to question the spend. The problem isn’t usually the ambition—it’s the lack of alignment between strategy and execution. Too many companies create plans that look good on paper but aren’t tied to funnel math, realistic budget allocations, or the sales team’s ability to execute. Without that grounding, campaigns stall early, leaving teams scrambling to explain missed targets.

Setting the right marketing budget is tough for B2B leaders. Most spend without benchmarks or revenue alignment, leaving growth at risk. Research shows typical investment is 7–12% of revenue. An audit helps confirm if your spend is realistic.